[Orca-users] Re: Compilation successes, failures and questions

[Blair Zajac]

No, using -O2 is perfect.  I didn't want to list a specific optimization level
since different people have different compilers and one level on one
compiler may not be available on another.

Keep the compiled files as is.

Blair

Dan Wentzel wrote:

> From: Dan Wentzel <danw at bas.army.mil>
>
> Hello all,
>
>         I've just compiled orca w/ the orcallator.  One problem that I had was that one
> of the sub-modules in the 'make modules' step had a GNUMakefile.  My sysadmin entered
> "make MAKE=gmake modules" and everything compiled fine.  However, I asked him
> about the 'optimization' of the compilation and he said that the -O2 option was more
> highly optimized than -O...  But the Orca documentation specifically states to use
> CFLAGS= -O for a more optimized version....  Should I use this compiled orca, or should
> I recompile with the CFLAGS= -O ??  I'm not good at this compiling stuff....
>
> DJW
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Special Offer-Earn 300 Points from MyPoints.com for trying @Backup
> Get automatic protection and access to your important computer files.
> Install today:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2344/7/_/_/_/953475861/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------