[Orca-users] Question on comparing interface bits/sec reported by ORCA vs SNMP

[Sean O'Neill]

Not sure how exactly to describe this so I attached the graphics to show 
what I'm "trying" to describe.

The cricket.png is obviously the results for my qe1 interface from SNMP 
queries by Cricket.  orca.png ... go figure.  The input bits on the 
interface are basically identical.  This is because I'm NFS mounting a 
bunch of stuff from an FreeBSD machine on the Solaris system - I'm positive 
most of this is ORCA processing related and reads for Squid report generation.

Its the output bits that are throwing me.  They are deviate by about 
100Kbps with ORCA showing the additional 100Kbps output.  What "additional" 
bandwidth utilization does Orca see that SNMP doesn't ?

Any thoughts appreciated.

Sean O'Neill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cricket.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5649 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/orca-users/attachments/20020308/f8b027da/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: orca.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6693 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/orca-users/attachments/20020308/f8b027da/attachment-0001.png>