[Orca-users] Re: Question on comparing interface bits/sec reported by ORCA vsSNMP

[Sean O'Neill]

Well, I did and I got a reply from Rich Pettit saying he didn't know.  He 
also said he didn't have time right now to look into it right now.  Oh 
well, a mystery for someone to solve.

At 05:32 PM 3/12/2002 -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
>Sean O'Neill wrote:
> >
> > Not sure how exactly to describe this so I attached the graphics to show
> > what I'm "trying" to describe.
> >
> > The cricket.png is obviously the results for my qe1 interface from SNMP
> > queries by Cricket.  orca.png ... go figure.  The input bits on the
> > interface are basically identical.  This is because I'm NFS mounting a
> > bunch of stuff from an FreeBSD machine on the Solaris system - I'm positive
> > most of this is ORCA processing related and reads for Squid report 
> generation.
> >
> > Its the output bits that are throwing me.  They are deviate by about
> > 100Kbps with ORCA showing the additional 100Kbps output.  What "additional"
> > bandwidth utilization does Orca see that SNMP doesn't ?
> >
> > Any thoughts appreciated.
> >
> > Sean O'Neill
>
>That's really odd.  I don't know.
>
>I would drop the same message to the new SE toolkit mailing list and see if
>they have anything to say.  Cc'ing this mailing list would be appreciated.
>
>Best,
>Blair
>
>--
>Blair Zajac <blair at orcaware.com>
>Web and OS performance plots - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
>
>
>
>

--
........................................................
......... ..- -. .. -..- .-. ..- .-.. . ... ............
.-- .. -. -... .-.. --- .-- ... -.. .-. --- --- .-.. ...

Sean O'Neill