[svnmerge] question about the integrated and avail subcommands

[Giovanni Bajo]

Madan U S <madan at collab.net> wrote:

>    Why do the 'svnmerge integrated' and 'svnmerge avail' commands require
a
> head option(in case the branch is tracked against more than one other
> branch)?
>
>    Why cant it list the integrated and available options against all heads
> available?

"avail" is a remote operation that can take even several minutes on large
repositories, so I don't think we should be slower by default.
"integrated" is a local opeartion, so it'd make more sense, but there is a
consistency issue then.

-- 
Giovanni Bajo