[svnmerge] question about the integrated and avail subcommands

[Giovanni Bajo]

Madan U S <madan at collab.net> wrote:

>> you know, what we need is 'svnmerge status'!!!
>
> 'svnmerge status' should list the following...
>
> /branches/branch1:
> r8-12: Merged by username on date at r13
> r15: Merged by username on date at r18
> r16: Hand merged by username on date at r19
>
> Empty revisions on /branches/branch1: r6-7,r13, r18-19
> Unmerged revisions on /branches/branch1: r21-22, r24, r26
>
> /branches/branch2:
> r6: Merged by username on date at r7
> r14: Hand merged by username on date at r20
>
> Empty revisions on /branches/branch2: r7-13, r15-16, r18-20
> Unmerged revisions on /branches/branch2: r23, r25
>
>
>    Have I missed something here? (maybe blocked revisions should be listed
> here too  :?

This is more a "svnmerge log", given that it goes through history. I have
been thinking of "svnmerge log" for a long time and I believe it would
indeed be an useful feature. We also have much infrastructure in place
(like, detecting the revisions at which the svnmerge-integrated property was
changed).
-- 
Giovanni Bajo