Re [Svnmerge] Noisy pychecker on svnmerge.py

Blair Zajac blair at orcaware.com
Wed Apr 12 08:59:21 PDT 2006


Madan U S wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:11:42 +0530, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer.com> wrote:
> 
>  > Madan U S <madan at collab.net> wrote:
>  >
>  >>> $ pychecker --version
>  >>> $ pychecker svnmerge.py
>  >>> svnmerge.py:85: Statement appears to have no effect
> [snip]
>  >>> svnmerge.py:1423: Using is not None, may not always work
>  >>>
>  >>> I cleaned up a few today already, but I've got other work to do now :)
>  >>
>  >> Okay... I see that the number has visibly reduced now. How should I make
>  >> patches fixing these... as a single patch, or as individual fixes?
>  >
>  > Last time I checked, many were bogus ones. For instance, I'm opposed to
>  > avoid the "is [not] None" paradigm.
> 
> Well, now, I dont see a single "is [not] None" error from pychecker. 
> Anyways, why were you oppposed to it?
> 
> I will start working on the rest... will send multiple fixes in every 
> patch. I hope this is fine.

Trying multiple versions of pychecker, it looks like older versions of the tool 
generate more warnings.  The "None" warnings are generated by 0.8.14.  Newer 
versions don't give those warnings.

Regards,
Blair

-- 
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<blair at orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/



More information about the Svnmerge mailing list