[Svnmerge] Bugs when merging revisions that modify and deletefiles

Archie Cobbs archie at dellroad.org
Mon Feb 13 18:18:34 PST 2006


Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>> Perhaps the answer is to always use "--force" when invoking
>> svn merge (at least, for the second and subsequent invocations):
>>
>>    - If the user did not say "svnmerge merge --force", then we know
>>      the working copy is clean (because we wouldn't have proceeded if
>>      not), and so any uncleanliness must be a result of a situation
>>      like this where --force is what we really want (*)
>>
>>    - If the user said "svnmerge merge --force" then that's what
>>      (s)he wanted anyway.
>>
>> First we'd have to think hard to make sure (*) is really true...
> 
> I'm kind of agreeing with your reasoning. To have a better picture, it would
> help to know what "svn merge --force" exactly does.

Right.. and that I don't really know. We'd either have to ask
an authority (svn mailing list), do some experiments, and/or
look at the code..

-Archie

__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs      *        CTO, Awarix        *      http://www.awarix.com



More information about the Svnmerge mailing list