[Svnmerge] Conflict on svnmerge-blocked property
dustin at zmanda.com
dustin at zmanda.com
Mon Apr 23 12:50:24 PDT 2007
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 03:35:23PM -0400, Raman Gupta wrote:
> The stopgap solution supports everything that svnmerge.py has every
> claimed to support. And it covers probably 90% of merge use cases. Its
> the old "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good"...
This argument makes a lot of sense. Also, most people won't be
upgrading to 1.5 immediately, so having a more capable svnmerge.py is
probably a good idea.
> If you still don't think the change is correct, ok. I for one am
> perfectly happy with my patched svnmerge and I am willing to wait for
> 1.5 for the correct solution :-) If Dustin, or whoever, will create
> the test case, then I might update my patch to handle the blocked
> property conflict too.
Ah, I thought someone else had developed a test case. I'll fix that up,
then.
Dustin
--
Dustin J. Mitchell
Storage Software Engineer, Zmanda, Inc.
http://www.zmanda.com/
More information about the Svnmerge
mailing list