[Orca-users] Re: I found a bug - I think
Peter Radcliffe
pir at pir.net
Sat Apr 29 08:35:56 PDT 2000
Wrapping at something under 76 columns is usually considered polite.
Sean O'Neill <sean.oneill at appnet.com> probably said:
> 1a) Orca is generating references in the index.html for the qfe
> interfaces that are not plumbed though. Blair, is this expected?
> qfe5 and qfe6, unplumbed inactive interfaces, shows graphs for
> Packets/sec and Errors/sec even though the data always zero. Oddly,
> qfe7 doesn't have any graphs at all.
orca will generate references to whatever interfaces SE/orcallator.se tells
it about.
> 3) The real problem occurs in the Available Targets section of the
> index.html. If I click on the Daily link for the system with the 6
> active interfaces, I get the page as expected except I only get a
> "Bits per Second" graph for the hme0 interface. None of the qfe
> interfaces have a "Bits per Second" graph. At the top of the page,
> there also isn't a link for "Bits per Second" for any of the qfe
> interfaces. Note that the graph are being generated though. See #2
> above. The "Packets per Second" and "Error per Second" show up as
> normal for all the interface (hme0 and the qfe's).
Edit orcallator.cfg, look for the KB/sec sections and add in ones for
the qfe devices you want to graph. By default qfe devices don't have
bits/sec generated, but I don't know if the driver gives the
information (the qe drier does not, but since the qfe stuff is basicly
hme and newer, it should).
P.
--
pir pir at pir.net pir at net.tufts.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the salesman clueless? Productopia has the answers.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3019/7/_/804404/_/957022569/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Orca-users
mailing list