[Svnmerge] 1.3.1 backports?
Blair Zajac
blair at orcaware.com
Tue Mar 7 17:58:51 PST 2006
On Mar 7, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Blair Zajac <blair at orcaware.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be good to just have the 1.3.x branch reflect trunk
>> exactly. So after the 1.3.x-svnmerge.py branch is merged into 1.3.x,
>> it would be good to take the remaining revisions over.
>
>
> My proposal would be not to merge new features in 1.3.x, just like
> the usual
> policy. Just bugfixes.
I think you're asking for more work here, and merging fixes that
depend upon back end work will be extra work. For example, David's
changes to work around conflicts on properties.
Svnmerge isn't a full software product like Subversion that needs to
freeze at a specific level. I see svnmerge.py being continuously
improved and those changes moved into successive svn 1.3.x releases.
Regards,
Blair
More information about the Svnmerge
mailing list