[Svnmerge] 1.3.1 backports?

[Raman Gupta]

Blair Zajac wrote:
> 
> On Mar 7, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> 
>> Blair Zajac <blair at orcaware.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> It would be good to just have the 1.3.x branch reflect trunk 
>>> exactly.  So after the 1.3.x-svnmerge.py branch is merged into
>>> 1.3.x, it would be good to take the remaining revisions over.
>> 
>> 
>> My proposal would be not to merge new features in 1.3.x, just like
>> the usual policy. Just bugfixes.
> 
> I think you're asking for more work here, and merging fixes that
> depend upon back end work will be extra work.  For example, David's
> changes to work around conflicts on properties.
> 
> Svnmerge isn't a full software product like Subversion that needs to 
> freeze at a specific level.  I see svnmerge.py being continuously 
> improved and those changes moved into successive svn 1.3.x releases.

+1

Cheers,
Raman